"Curiosity" the key to knowledge

There are so many things i want to know about.this is a good place to put things that i find interesting.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

I am an Research Consultant at IDC, IIT Bombay, my passion is to explore how people make sense of the world around them. My areas of interest include experience design, communication design, interaction design, storytelling and visual language. I received my Ph.D. in 2011 from IIT Bombay. My doctoral thesis entitled ‘Moment and Moments: Discourse in Static Visual Narratives’, explores how stories (written or oral) are communicated through static images using the structuralist perspective. I like to make complicated things simple & transform boring things to fun!

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Technique of painting prescribed in ancient Indian Texts

contents:
- introduction
- origin of painting
- instructions regarding time and ritual of painting
- preparation of bhumi
- carriers and grounds
- crayons and brushes
- source of colours
- mixing of colours
- binding medium
- technical process
- drawing
- human figures
- other aspects of painting
- unmilana
- topics described in ‘Chitrasutra’
- bibliography

introduction:
Painting has a rich history in ancient India. It was considered a mode of worship and one of the noblest offerings to the Almighty. The painter in India was almost like a yogi lost in his art. According to the vishudharmottara an artist must be restrained, wear immaculate apparel, salute the holy ones, pronounce auspicious utterances, bow down to the deity, sit facing the east and start painting contemplating on the deity:
Hitrayoge viseshena svetavasa yatatmavan, brahmanan pujayitva tu svasti vachya pranamaya cha, pranmukho devatadhyayi citrakarma samacharet:
Vishnudharmottara 3, 40, 11-13.
Thus painting in ancient India was mainly handmade of religion. Therefore there were certain norms and methods to be followed to make a painting as it had to be the best and fit to be presented to the almighty.
Technique of painting thus was an important aspect.
In an early verse of the third part, the Visnudharmottara states that canons of painting would be better understood after the successive study of the disciplines of vocal music, instrumental music and dancing.
The Chitrasutra comes, therefore, after the Nrtyasutra, i.e. the cannons of
dancing.
The myth of the first painting is interesting as it sheds light on the first
sketch.

origin of painting:
The myth about the origin of the Chitrasutra is as follows:
It was the sage Narayana who made it for the good of the people. The great sage in order to confuse the heavenly damsels (who had come to tempt him) drew a beautiful woman on the ground with the juice of mango. Out of the picture was created the beautiful apsaras. She was Urvasi. [Urvasi is referred to as drawn on ground – urvyam and not on uru (on thigh)]. Looking at her the heavenly damsels were ashamed and went away.
Thus was created the perfect Chitra by the great sage.

instructions regarding time and ritual of painting:
The instructions of how a painter should work have been given. he has to start work in the Chitra Naksatra. He should practise abstinence before starting his work. He should wear a white dress, pay respect to the Brahmins and get their blessings. Then he should get the blessings of the teachers who are masters in the art according to precedence, then facing the east and meditating on the deity, he should start his painting.

carriers and grounds:
From early times Indian painter worked on
Wall-----------------------------kudya or bhitti
Panel---------------------------oatta or phalaka
Cloth---------------------------pata
Strips of cloth--------------dussa-pata (Samyutta-Nikaya)
Well polished panel-------suparimattha phalaka
Other surfaces-------------bhittadau (Shilparatna)
Preparation of the ground------Bhumibandhana (Samarangana-sutradhara)

crayons and brushes:
The gathering of tools and materials by the painter is referred to in the line chitrasadhanambula goni.
Surprisingly the tools required for drawing the sketch, the vartika as it is know, tulikas or brushes for painting, the colour pans mallakas , the colour box varnikasamudgaka and several other requisites essential for painting are not mentioned.
The line hitakarma samacharet svetakadravakrishnabhir vartikabhir yathakramam (3, 40, 13) names the brushes as vartikas.
The word vartika has itself been n a rather general sense of both a pencil and brush. The shilpa texts like abhilashitarthachintamani, the sivatattvaratnakara and the shilparatna use the word exclusively for connoting a crayon or pastel for drawing. It is named tindukavarti in the former text, while both the latter call it kittavarti :
Purvam tindukalehyam syad yad va vartikaya budhaih, akaramatrikam rekham tinuvartvirmitam, abhiashitarthahintamani; akaramatrikam rekham kittavartivinrmitam, sivattvaratnakar; alikhet kittaartinya, silparatna.
Here a distinction is made between a carefully burnt twig as a crayon and a rolled carbonaceous stump of pastille.
Tindu is a special variety of ebony
Kitta is a secretion coloured black with carbon and prepared as a roll or pastille or varti for sketching.
The process of the preparation is given in the Abhilashitarthachintamani:
Khachhuram bhaktasiktena mriditva kantakakritim, vartim kritva tatha lekhyam vartika nama sa bhavet.

The line samstambhitam chitram udarapuchchhaih (3, 40, 30) indicates the use of brushes prepared with selective animal hair like sable, squirrel, hog and so forth.


colours:
The painters in India used as main colours, white, black, blue, yellow and
red by an admixture of which hundreds of colours were made. The
‘Chitrasutra” classifies
four types of colours:
1) those which are faithful representations of nature
2) those which observe the true proportion but largely exaggerated the size
3) those which are particularly expressive of the plastic qualities and perspectives
4) those which are an admixture of the three
the rangadravyas or substances from which colour pigments are made are mineral and vegetable dyes.
Rangadravyani kanakam rajatam tamram eva cha abhrakam rajavartam cha sinduram trapur eva cha, haritalam sudha laksha tatha hingulakam nripa, nilam cha manujasreshtha tathanye santyanekasah, dese dese mahaaja karyas te stambhanayutah, lohanam patravinyasam bhaved vapi rasakriya,
Vishnudharmottara, 3, 40, 25-27
Kanakam – gold
Rajata – silver
Tamra – copper
Abgrakam – mica
Rajavarta - ultramarine or lapis lazuli
Sindhuram – red lead
Trapu – lead
Haritala – yellow orpiment
Sudha – lime
Laksa – lac
Hingulakam – vermillion
Nila – indigo
In every country, there are many such substances. They should be manufactured with an astringent (stambhanayutah). The irons or metals should be either thinned into leaves (patravinyasa) or they should be made liquid (rasakriya) (chemical treatment).

Primary colours:
Visnudharmottara
sveta – white
rakta – red
pita – yellow
krsna – black
harita - green

Manasollasa
suddhavarna 4 in number
llasa – white (from lime)
sona- red lead
rakta- blood red
lohita- red ochra
haritala – yellow orpiment
lampblack

Silparatna
sita- white
pita- yellow
rakta- red
kajjala- black
syama- dark shade

sources of colours:
white – sveta / sita:
Manasollasa and Silparatna
Both text have noted white-clay or kaolin and lime i.e. sudha, prepared from burnt conch, oyster or other shells, as the main source of white pigments.
Manasollasa
Refers to one that can be obtained from the Nilgiri mountain of the south.
This particular white was renowned as naga, i.e. born of mountain, and its whiteness rivaled that of the moon.
Kasyapasilpa
4 types of white
sveta – like the colour of pearl
sukla – like that of a conch-shell
dhavala – like silver or milk
avadata – like that of a star
Connoisseurs of painting were capable to discern various shades of a colour in ancient India.
For e.g. Bana gives various names for the distinctive shades of different colours.
For white:
White of conch-shell and milk
Shades of ivory-white
Foam-white
Campaka-white
Karnikara-white

red:
Manasollasa
darada – red lead
sona – crimson
alaktarasa- juice of lac
rakta – blood red
lohita – red ochre
Silparatna
sindura – red lead
mrdurakta – soft red
madhyarakta – red orchre for middle red
laksarasa – juice of lac
atirakta – deep red

yellow:
Kasyapasilpa
4 distinct shades
svarna – golden
pisanga – that of shore
pita – yellow
harita = haridra – turmeric

black:
Kasyapasilpa
4 distinct shades
nila – hue of clouds
syama – that of forest crow
kala – that of a peacock
krsna – colour of the wing of a balck-bee
Bana gives various names for the distinctive shades of black.
light black – that of a buffalo
darker black – like the face of a golangula monkey
black of the pitch dark night – resembles the wing of the bird casa


Metalic colours perparation:
It is stated that the application in painting metals should be either thinned into leaves (patravinyasa) or made liquid by chemical treatment (rasakriya).
As for the preparation of the metallic colours, it is advised that the metals should be turned into liquid by putting them into a narrow vessel.
- fragmented gold-leaves should be put into the pit of a mortar and then be levigated with the help of a grindstone. (Silparatna)
- mica should be transformed into liquid bitumen and bellium. (Visnudharmottara)


Application of metallic colours: (Manasollasa):
Pure gold, which is costly, should be slowly ground on a stone slab with an instrument (tunda) having at its tip the virana grass. The gold-powder thus prepared should be placed in a bronze vessel and melted over again.
Thereafter water should be poured into it and then be stirred up time and again. Now water of the vessel should be so carefully shifted that the stone-dusts remain for their solidarity. In this manner, pure golden pigments, showing the hue of the luster of a newly risen sun, would be prepared. Thereafter, this gold-pulp should be mixed with a small quantity of vajralepa, should be placed at the tip of the brush and all ornaments, imagined as of gold, should be gilded therewith. When the gold applied in painting becomes dry, it should be slowly rubbed with a boar-tusk as long as necessary to attain a brightness of lightning.


mixing of colours:
The primary colours mularanga are
sveta - white
rakta - red
pita - yellow
krsna - black
harita - green
sveto raktas tatha pitah krishno harita eva cha, mulavarnas samakhyatah panha parthivasattama, ekadvitrisamayagat bhavakalpanaya tatha, sankhyaivantaravarnanam loke kartum na sakyate.
Nrittasutra in Vishnudharmottara, 3, 27, 8-9
By mixing one, two or three of the colours and by a manipulation of the imagination of the artist, there is no limit to the numerous finer varieties of tints that can be produced.

- Chavis or colours of skin based upon primary colours:
The word chavi is to be taken to mean the colour of the skin or of a surface in the case of paintings.
The 2 principal colours for painting the skin are
Dark syama or White gaura

The dark of the skin is of 12 kinds while the white is of 5 kinds:
Dark syama
Reddish dark raktasyama
Dark like the mudga pulse mudgasyama
Dark like druva grass durvankurasyama
Pale dark pandusyama
Greenish dark haritasyama
Yellowish dark pitasyama
Dark like priyangu creeper priyangusyama
Dark like monkey’s face kapisyama
Dark like a blue lotus nilotpalasyama
Dark like the casa bird casasyama
Dark like red lotus raktotpalasyama
Dark like cloud ghanasyama


White gaura
Gold like white rukma
Ivory like white dantagauri
White like the split sandal sphutacandanagauri
Autum cloud like white saradghana
Autum moon like white candraka gauri


binding media:
In the process of preparing the ground and then in fastening colours on that
ground, the binding medium plays a very significant role in painting.
In fact in the characterization of technique of a painting the nature of the medium is always taken into consideration; and accordingly, the universally accepted classification, such as, oil, water, tempera, fresco, etc. is generally formulated on the basis of the medium.
Shilpa text – medium from animal source
medium from vegetable source


preparation of bhumi:
- preparation of wall : bhittisamakara
The preparation of loam to be applied to the plaster on the wall to make a proper base for painting is as follows: a mixture of powdered brick, gum resin, bees wax, molasses, oil, burnt lime plaster, in definite proportions, pulp of bilva, bark or pinhchhila, sand and lime all to be soaked for a month in water. The surface of the wall to painted on has to be prepared by the application of this loam, the coat neither too thick nor too thin, making it meticulously even in its surface and glossy, smoothned with clayey liquid, juice of sarja and oil and rubbed by repeated sprinkling of milk, so that when it is dry it could last a century.

- preparation of board phalaka or canvas pata : ghattana
in the case of canvas on a board, vidyaranya describes that process in
his Panchadasi, yatha dhauto ghattitascha lanchhito ranjitah patah’
‘like the canvas whitened, prepared, marked i.e. sketched out and
coloured….’
- phalaka ghattinchi : is the preparation of the board with canvas applied to it.
- Merungidi: which literally means ‘giving brilliance’


technical process:
A couple of verses of the Samarangana-sutradhara, though corrupt, throw a flood of light on the method to be followed while painting.
These verses refer to ‘eight-limbs’ (asta-angani) of painting to which an artist should adhere for achieving success as a painter.
Coomaraswamy made a careful study of these verses. Thus according to him the eight stages covered by the verses are:
vartika
bhumibandhan
rekhakarma
laksana
karsakarm
vartanakrama
lekhakarana
dvikakarma


drawing:
- Composition
The Indian artist when represent the character of the Buddha or the
Budhisattva, of the gods and goddesses, did not lay emphasis on any
passing feeling of delight, anger, hatred or the like, but they tried to
discover the true personality as the object of creation.
This personality was perceived by them as dominating over individual
moments of varying emotions and could be regarded as characterizing
the soul or essence of the artist’s object of creation.
This personality was a passing phase and could not, therefore, have
been visually perceived, but it was constructed by the artist’s mind
and intuited in contemplation.
In composition the central figure is given importance and the other
figures lead to the heightening of the fundamental emotions or fuller
expression of the central figure for which alone the others existed.


- varnaka or praticchanda
The artist should first draw a rough sketch and then produce their
pictures. This rough sketch seems to be called as varnaka or
hastalekha.

- the commentator
the painter should draw the picture with white, dark yellow or reddish
brown kadrava and with black brushes in due order. He should then
apply colour in accordance with the sthana.

- line quality
the picture must be graceful, free of crooked lines. The painter is adept in
drawing.
His lines are steady and even. It is said in the Vishnudharmottara that the
great masters, aharyas, valued most the line drawing composing the picture.
There were others among the masters who also paid great attention to the
creation of an illusion of depth by shading. Women generally preferred
ornamentation in a picture and the general spectator reveled in colour,
rekham prasamsantyacharya vartanam apare jaguh, striyo bhushanam ichichanti varnadhyam itare janah,
Vishnudharmottara 3, 41, 11.
The lines composing a picture, were laid in as laconic a manner as probably the sutrakaras like Panini, who enjoyed.
The artist and the art critics appreciated the best effect in a picture captured by the minimum of lines composing the figure. In the Viddhasalabhanjika occours the remark of the vidushaka that the painting looks complete with even a minimum of drawing,
api laghu likhiteyam drisyate purnamurtih.
The chitrasutra gives the highest tribute to the painter who can paint with ease rolling waves, darting flames, smoky streaks, fluttering banners and apasarases floating in the sky indicating the direction and movement of the wind.
Tarangagnisikhadhumam vaijayantyapsaradikam, vayugatya likhed yas tu vijneyas sa tu chitravit.
Vishnudharmottara 3, 43, 28.
It also reckons as a great master one who can draw accurately a chosen subject clearly indicating it as asleep or unconscious or dead as the case may be.
suptam cha chetanayuktam mritam chitanyavarjitam, nimnonnatavibhagam cha yah karoti sa chitravit,
Vishnudharmottara 3, 43, 29.
The Vishnudharmottara lays down that, as in dance so in painting, there is to be a close observation and reproduction of the world around us in as charming a style as possible
yatha nritte tatha hitre trailokyanukritis smrita.



- Vartana
The author of Vishnudharmottara has used the word ‘vartana’ the meaning of which is controversial. Vishnudharmottara enumerates 3 types of vartana
Raikhika- fine lineation, binduja – stippling and patraja - cross-hatching.
In the paper titled ‘a peep into the world chitra’ the author madam
Vijayanti has shed a new light.
“ previous scholars envisaged the meaning of Vartana as ‘shade and
light’ on a closer look at the word vartana……..


- kshayavridhi or foreshortning
The concept of foreshortning i.e. the lengthening or the shrinking of the
limbs is called
Kshaya-vriddhi. It is explained with the nine postures when viewed from
different angles.
In describing the various kinds of postures the “Chitrasutra” advises the
display of various kinds of light and shade in and through which the exact
position of the postures could be expressed. According to diversity in
posture there is a diversity of relation of the different parts of the body
which disturbs the normal relation that the head bears to the different limbs.
Twelve such postures are described in the “Chitrasutra”.


human figures:
In the canons of Indian art there is a definite and prescribed
proportion of the limbs and their ratio to one another. The Indian artist paid
more attention to ratio than to the actual standard of measurement of the
different limbs.
The ratio being the same, the figures may be pigmy or colossal. A standard
measurement, however, was in vogue.
Angula: the measurements of the 5 types are given in terms of angula.
The measurement of each of the types would be relative to their respective
angulas.

Tala: in the context of mana or proportion, the division of the limbs in terms of tala measurement is elaborately discussed in the Vishnudharmottara. Tala is made up of 12 inches dvadasangulavistaras tala ityabhidhiyate 3,35,11.
Tala is said to be of 12 angulas in extant.

5 kinds of male bodies and their characteristics
Hamsa - 108 angulas
Beautiful face, nice waist, a gait like that of a swan and is strong, has arms like the kind of serpents i.e. sesa, moon-white complexion and eyes having the colour of honey.


Bhadra - 106 angulas
Lotus complexioned, strong round arms, great intelligence, a gait like that of an elephant and hairy cheeks.

Malavya - 104 angulas
Dark complexion like that of kidney-bean, a slender waist, slim figure, arms reaching up to knees thick shoulders, nose like that of an elephant i.e. prominent and large jaws.

Ruchaka - 100 angulas
Autumn-white complexion, a conch like neck, great intelligence is truthful, of good taste and strong.


Sasaka - 90 angulas
Is reddish dark, somewhat spotted, clever, has full cheeks and eyes having the colour of honey.

The foot up to the ankle is 3 inches (3 angulas) , whence up to the knee is 2 talas (24 angulas).
The knee 3 inches the thigh 2 talas, a tala each from the navel to the penis, from the navel to the heart and from the heart to the throat, the neck a third of a tala, the face a tala, the head beyond one sixth of a tala, the hand a tala, the forearm and arm 17 inches each and so forth.


Measurement of Hamsa is the standard measurement given on relation to
which the measurements of the other types are to be worked out keeping in
mind the characteristics of that particular type.

There is a discussion about the body types of women but it has not been specified. But the discussion does state that as there are 5 body types of male, according to the measurements of the limbs and parts, so are there 5 kinds of female bodies. It has also been stated that a woman be placed near her man so as to reach the shoulder of the man. The waist of the woman has to be made thinner by 2 angulas than that of a man and the hip should be made bigger by 4 angulas.


- characteristics of great men
king should posses the physical characteristics of great men. Hands and feet of a cakravartin should be shown with jala or web.
Urna or tuft of hair should be shown as an auspicious mark between their eyebrows.
3 lines should be shown in the hands of kings. They should be charming red like the blood of hare and slenderly curved. The hair should be made thin, wary, shiny, with natural glossiness and like the dark blue sapphire.


- forms of eye
chapakara – bow : used in case of meditation, is of 3 yavas;
matsyodara - for depicting feminine and lovelorn eyes, is in 4 yavas;
utpalapatrabha - for depicting a placid look, is in 6 yavas;
padmaoatranibha - to show the frightned and the weeping, is in 9 yavas;
sankhakriti – for suggesting the angered and the one experiencing deep pain, is in 10 yavas.

- hair styles
kuntala: long flowing hair
dakshinavarta: curling to the right
taranga: wavy
simhakesara: mane-like
vardhara: sticking out disheveled
jutatasara: matted

- image of deity
eye of god, should be red at the corners, have black pupil and long eye-lashes. It should be serene and pleasing. Such an eye is for the welfare of the people. But if one wants wealth and happiness, one should make the padmapatra eye. It should have the colour of cow’s milk, placid, even, wide, serene and pleasant to look at. It should have eye-lash sloping at the end and black pupil.

- posture sthanas
9 sthanas
rjvagata
anrju
sacikrtasarira
ardhavilocana
parsvagata
paravrtta
prsthagata
parivrtta
samanata

the 9 postures can be better styled views, as they are the same straight riju,
viewed from different angles, to show the same figure, with different
proportions hidden from view in different positions causing foreshortening.
The ratio of the head with the other limbs of the body differed in accordance
with the difference in postures.
In describing the various kinds of postures the ‘Chitrasutra’ advises the
display of various kinds of light and shade I and through which the exact
position of the postures could be expressed.

other aspects in a painting:
madhuratva: is making the picture appealing by the infusion of bhava.

Rasas: flavours and moods that distinguish paintings are discussed at length.

Vibhakthata: this is ahieved by vartana or the 3 fold method of shading possible in both monochrome and polychrome.

Sadrishya: is the element of veracity to nature and the element of portraiture. In the Chitrasutra and in the 46th chapter of ‘Shilparatna’ that the artist should pay special attention to faithfulness to nature.
A potrait is thus defined as an art of imitating the exact likeness of the inanimate and the immovable object of nature as well as the animals.
It has further been laid down that this likeness is not limited merely to a general likeness, but it should mean exact likeness of all the limbs or parts of the tree, creeper, mountains or the animals.

Perspective: from the paintings of Ajanta and various description of paintings, as well as from the “Chitrasutra”, it can be proved that ancient Indians recognized the value or the significance of the perspective. It is said in the “Chitrasutra” that a man who does not know how to show the difference between a sleeping and a dead man or who cannot portray the visual gradations of a highland and a low land is no artist at all. The above saying shows that the Indians had a sound knowledge of the spatial perspective.


unmilana:
After all the stages of work, the unmilana ‘opening of the eyes’ of the figure is described as the final act.
The importance of unmilana is given in the lines:
Sajiva iva drisyate, sasvasa iva yachchitram tachchitram subhalakshanam,
Vishnudharmottara, 3, 43, 21-22
‘that is an auspicious painting in which the figures appear to be alive and almost breathe and move’
this is what is achieved by performing the final act in a painting and infusing life into a painting.


topics discussed in chitrasutra:
adhyaya 35: origin of painting : ayamocchrayamana
5 types of men
standard of measurement (hamsa type)
adhyaya 36: measurements of parts of body: pramanadhyaya
adhyaya 37: proportion of women: samanyamana
5 types of eyes
6 types of hairstyle
adhyaya 38: instruction to make image of god: pratimalaksana
adhyaya 39: postures : ksaya-vrddhi
qualities
adhyaya 40: various paints and how to mix them: rangavyatikara
adhyaya 41: 4 types of paintings :rangavartana
3 kinds of brushes
faults to be avoided
adhyaya 42: deals with various objects which become subject of painting:
rupanirmana
adhyaya 43: nine sentiments of painting are described:
srngaradibhavayuktadi


bibliograpy:

- Vishnudharmottarapuran : Dr. Priyabala Shah

- Technique of Indian Painting: Asok K. Bhattacharya

- Fundamentls of Indian Art: S. N. Dasgupta



Sherline Pimenta

M.V.A. Part I

April 2006

M. S. U. Baroda

what was the origin of the fork?

History of the fork
Before the fork was introduced Westerners were reliant on the spoon and knife as the only eating utensils. Mostly, however, people would eat food with their hands. Members of upper social classes would sometimes be accustomed manners considered more "proper" and hold two knives at meals and use them to both cut and transfer food to the mouth.
The fork was introduced in the Middle East before the year 1000. The earliest forks usually had only two tines, but those with multiple tines caught on quickly. The tines on these implements were straight, meaning the fork could only be used for spearing food and not for scooping it. The fork was a great development in that it allowed meat to be easily held in place while being cut. The fork also allowed one to spike a piece of meat and shake off any undesired excess of sauce or liquid before consuming it. By the 11th century the table fork had made its way to Italy by way of the Byzantine Empire. In Italy it became quite popular by the 14th century, being commonly used for eating by merchant and upper classes by 1600.

The fork's arrival in northern Europe was more difficult. Its use was first described in English by Thomas Coryat in a volume of writings on his Italian travels (1611), but for many years it was viewed as an unmanly Italian affectation. Some writers of the Catholic Church expressly disapproved of its use, seeing it as "excessive delicacy". It was not until the 18th century that the fork became commonly used in Great Britain. It was around this time that the curved fork used today was developed in Germany. The standard four-tine design also became current at this time (the three-pronged variety is known as a trident).

Types of fork
baby fork
beef fork
berry fork
cheese fork
cold meat fork
dessert fork
dinner fork
fish fork
game fork
ice cream fork
joint fork
lemon fork
lettuce fork
meat fork
olive fork
oyster fork
pastry fork
pickle fork
pie fork
ramekin fork
relish fork
salad fork
sardine fork
shrimp fork
spork
steak fork
tea fork
vegetable fork
Non-cutlery types of fork
military fork
pitchfork/hayfork
spading fork

Bibliography
An history of the evolution of fork design can be found in: Henry Petroski, The Evolution of Useful things (1992); ISBN 0679740392

Another account of the history of the fork
The fork came to Europe through Italy's nobility in the eleventh century. Throughout the next five hundred years, the table fork spread throughout Europe, and into the lesser social classes. By 1600, the fork was known in England, although rare and viewed as an Italian affectation, while in Italy even the merchant classes were using forks regularly.
We can deduce that forks were not common by looking at various inventories and wills from the Middle Ages. The few forks listed were made of precious materials, and presumably kept primarily for dazzle and ostentation. They may also have been used as investment pieces for the value of the materials used [Bailey]. Some specific examples include:
The Will of John Baret of Bury St. Edmunds, 1463: "Itm J. yeve and beqwethe to Davn John Kertelynge my silvir forke for grene gyngor"[Bailey]
The Jewelhouse inventory of Henry VIII: "Item one spone wt suckett fork at the end of silver and gilt"[Bailey]
Inventory of property left by Henry VII: "Item, one Case wherein are xxi knives and a fork, the hafts being crystal and chalcedony, the ends garnished with gold" [Hayward]
"Item, one Case of knives furnished with divers knives and one fork, whereof two be great hafts of silver parcel-gilt, the case covered with crimson velvet" [Hayward].
Forks also appear in an inventory of silverware in Florence, taken in 1361 [Giblin], in inventories of Charles V and Charles VI of France [Bailey], and in Italian cookbooks of the late 1400's [Giblin]. All these references do not mean that forks were common - the fork was known only to the very uppermost classes, and seldom used even among them.
A Byzantine princess introduced the table fork to Europe in the eleventh century. The story varies slightly depending on the source, but the essence is that a nobleman, probably Domenico Selvo (or Silvio), heir to the Doge of Venice, married a princess from Byzantium. This Byzantine princess brought a case of two- tined table forks to Venice as part of her luggage. Forks seem to have been novelties in Byzantium, but not unknown. Many examples can be found in Byzantine art, according to Boger and Henisch.
The princess outraged the populace and the clergy by refusing to eat with her hands:
"Instead of eating with her fingers like other people, the princess cuts up her food into small pieces and eats them by means of little golden forks with two prongs."[Giblin]
"God in his wisdom has provided man with natural forks - his fingers. Therefore it is an insult to Him to substitute artificial metallic forks for them when eating."[Giblin]
The princess apparently died before very long, of some wasting disease, prompting Peter Damian, Cardinal Bishop of Ostia to write,
"Of the Venetian Doge's wife, whose body, after her excessive delicacy, entirely rotted away"[Henisch]
Other evidence of the fork coming to Europe from the east is given in a letter by a Franciscan monk to Louis IX of France. He discusses the eating habits of the Tartars in the middle of the thirteenth century:
"With the point of a knife or a fork especially made for this purpose - like those with which we are accustomed to eat pears or apples cooked in wine - they offer to each of those standing around one or two mouthfuls."[Henisch]
This fragment of a letter and listings in inventories and wills link the fork with fruits and sweetmeats. We also see the fork was used to eat dishes that included a sticky sauce or that might stain the fingers [Boger, Bailey]. At one time, this practice was primarily that of courtesans, prompting the Church to ban the fork as an immoral influence [Gruber].
The fork would be used to spear a piece of food, lift it from the plate or serving bowl, and shake any excess sauce from it. Then one would pluck the food from the fork using the tips of the fingers and place the morsel in the mouth. The early forks were small, with short straight tines, and therefore probably used only for spearing and holding food, rather than scooping. The curve with which we are familiar in the modern fork was introduced in France in the seventeenth century [Boger.]
Forks were known and used in Spain, at least by the upper classes, by the time of the Armada. A large assortment was recovered from the wreck of La Girona, which sank off the coast of Ireland in 1588. La Girona carried Don Alonso de Leiva and his retinue, who apparently traveled well equipped. Don Alonso is known to have entertained the Duke of Medina Sidonia before the Armada sailed, "in grand style, with musical accompaniment, at his table sumptuously set with silver plate and cutlery and gold-plated candelabra [Flanagan]." This cutlery included a large number of forks, with anywhere from two to five tines. These tines are all straight, as opposed to curved, although the five tined variety appears to be slightly splayed at the points. The many pieces recovered are fragmentary - either tines or handles, but few pieces still joined. The handles include a simple baluster stem with a terminal in the form of a hoof, to elegant handles with terminals in the form of serpents or of human torsos, among others. One wonders what was the purpose of so many different styles of fork.
Thomas Coryat of Odcombe, near Yeovil, in a book titled "Coryat's Curdities Hastily gobbled up in Five Months Travels in France, Savoy, Italy, &c.," published in London, 1611, claims to be one of the first Englishmen to use a fork. We see from his writing that while forks were almost unknown in England, they were common in Italy and not unusual in other parts of Europe.
I observed a custome in all those Italian Cities and Townes through which I passed, that is not used in any other country that I saw in my travels, neither do I thinke that any other nation of Christendome doth use it, but only Italy. The Italian, and also most strangers that are commorant in Italy, doe alwaies, at their meales use a little forke when they cut the meate; for while with their knife, which they hold in one hand, they cut the meate out of the dish, they fasten their forke which they hold in their other hande, upon the same dish, so that whatsoever he be that sitteth in the company of any others at meate, should unadvisedly touch the dish of meate with his fingers, from which all at the table doe cut he will give occasion of offence unto the company as having transgressed the lawes of good manners, insomuch for his error he shall be at least browbeaten, if not reprehended in words. This forme of feeding I understand is generally used in all places of Italy, their forks being for the most part made of yron or steele, and some of silver, but those are used only by gentlemen. The reason of this their curiosity, is because the Italian cannot by any means endure to have his dish touched with fingers, seeing all men's fingers are not alike cleane. Hereupon I myselfe thought good to imitate the Italian fashion by this forked cutting of meate, not only while I was in Italy, but also in Germany, and oftentimes in England, since I came home, being once quipped for that frequent using of my forke by a certain learned gentleman a familiar friend of mine, one Mr. Lawrence Whittaker, who in his merry humour, doubted not to call me at table Furcifer, only for using a forke at feeding but for no other cause.
The humor is, according to Bailey, in the use of "Furcifer" as a pun, meaning fork-bearer, and also gallows-bird.
Ben Jonson also used forks as the basis of humor in two of his plays. In "Volpone" (1606), Sir Politick Would-be instructs Peregrine most humorously on correct behavior while in Italy, including "Then must you learn the use and handling of your silver fork at meals." [Act IV Scene I]. And in "The Devil is an Ass" (1616):
MEERCROFT, the projector. Upon my project of the forks . . .
SLEDGE. Forks! What be they?
MEERCROFT. The laudable use of forks, brought into custom here as they are in Italy to the sparing of napkins . . .
In a slightly more serious vein, Henisch quotes a letter by one Montaigne, of the late sixteenth century, as follows:
I could dine without a tablecloth, but to dine in the German fashion, without a clean napkin, I should find very uncomfortable. I soil them more than the Germans or Italians, as I make very little use of either spoon or fork.
The earliest fork known to have been made in England is now in the Victoria and Albert Museum. It bears the crests of John Manners, 8th Earl of Rutland and his wife Frances, daughter of Edward Lord Montagu of Boughton [Bailey]. It is two-tined and squarish, made of silver, and bears the London hallmark for 1632-3 [Hayward].
In other parts of Europe, it became customary to make knives and forks in sets. Better quality knives of the sixteenth century came in sets of a dozen or more contained in a leather case, and included a fork to be used for serving [Hayward]. This case or "stocke" is what the inventories of Henry VIII refer to. Only very wealthy households would provide knives for guests. It was much more common for people to carry their own cutlery with them [Hayward, Bailey]. Even the inns were not equipped with tableware, expecting the traveller to provide their own [Bailey]. As forks became more common, sets of knife and fork, often with a sheath or case for the pair, came into use. Some travelers had a collapsible or folding set of knife, fork, and spoon [Giblin], much like today's camping tableware.
So, there are a variety of table forks available for use in the period of the SCA. The persona most likely to use a fork would be a rich, late period Italian, while the least likely would be an early period Englishman (or Saxon, or Briton). A poor persona would be very unlikely to use a fork at any time in the SCA period. The richer, later period, and closer to Italy a western European is, the more likely they are to use a fork at table.


Copyright 1994 by Susan Carroll-Clark, 53 Thorncliffe Park Dr. #611,Toronto, Ontario M4H 1L1 CANADA. Permission granted forrepublication in SCA-related publications, provided author is creditedand receives a copy.